Advertising only works if there’s trust. If someone writes a ‘review’ of a product we need to be able to trust that their opinion is unbiased, not motivated by a pay check. That’s a conflict of interest. If it’s such a good product, advertisers shouldn’t need to rely on underhand tactics such as bribing reviewers.

Nice post, sir. Wouldn’t have been aware of this had you not shared. [adds another item to the “dream workstation” wishlist]

Thanks!

Big Difference? They mentioned at the end:

[ This was a sponsored post for LG via Syndicate Ads. ]

Now I may be being cynical (and regardless of the merits of what looks like a nice monitor) but is this article also sponsored? Because I can’t see it mentioned anywhere. An accident?

when it comes to color accuracy and value for money the dell ultra sharp line is still consistently reviewed amongst the top screens. (goo.gl/1HC63t)

and another consideration is if it wouldn’t be better to go for a higher pixel density like the 28″ – 3.840 x 2.160 Pixel Samsung monitor ( goo.gl/eRN36X ) Even though working with graphics and layouts for web in photoshop is always very weird on such screens since everything is very tiny …